Most companies comparing Egnyte and SharePoint believe they’re choosing between two document management systems. They aren’t. Egnyte is a file sync and share platform with strong governance features layered on top. SharePoint can be a document management system, but only if someone designs it as one. Set it up the way most companies do, folders copied from the old file server, and it’s a file share in the cloud. So is Egnyte. The decision most buyers think they’re making, and the one they’re actually making, are different decisions.
We’re a SharePoint consulting firm, so read this knowing where we sit. We also lose this comparison sometimes, and the section on when Egnyte is the better choice is where we explain why. If you want the broader comparison against true enterprise content platforms, that’s in SharePoint vs dedicated document management systems. This post is about Egnyte specifically.
What Is Egnyte?
Egnyte is a cloud content platform built around file sync, sharing and hybrid storage, with governance, classification and ransomware protection added at the higher tiers. Its roots are in replacing on-premises file servers for companies with big files and distributed offices. That heritage shows in its strengths: a fast desktop sync client, local caching for large files through edge devices, folder-based permissions that map neatly from a Windows file server, and external sharing that works without much configuration.
Egnyte publishes per-user pricing on its site, with a Business tier around $22 per user per month and Enterprise tiers roughly $39 to $48, billed annually, plus custom pricing at the top. Add-ons exist for AEC, financial services and life sciences. For a 200-person company on an Enterprise tier, that’s a six-figure annual bill before implementation.
What Is SharePoint?
SharePoint is the document and content platform inside Microsoft 365, and it’s what stores every file in Teams and every file you share from OneDrive for Business. It supports metadata, content types, versioning, retention, sensitivity labels, workflows through Power Automate, and it grounds Microsoft 365 Copilot. It is also, for most companies, already paid for.
That last part gets lost in comparisons. A company evaluating Egnyte almost always holds Microsoft 365 licenses, which means it owns SharePoint, OneDrive and a terabyte-plus of pooled storage already. The real question is whether Egnyte is worth paying for on top. Whether SharePoint counts as a document management system at all is a fair question, and we answer it directly in is SharePoint a good document management system. Short version: yes, if it’s designed. No, if it’s a folder dump.
The Mistake Most Egnyte vs SharePoint Comparisons Make
The mistake is comparing feature lists as if both products do the same job. Egnyte is a very good file platform. SharePoint is a content platform that can be a file platform if you let it. When a company migrates its file server to Egnyte, it gets the same folders in the cloud, faster and safer, with better sharing. When a company migrates its file server to SharePoint without redesigning anything, it gets the same folders in the cloud too, minus Egnyte’s sync polish and plus a lot of confused users.
In our engagements the Egnyte question comes up most often from companies that tried SharePoint that second way, hated it, and now think the product is the problem. Egnyte then looks like relief. It is relief, for the sync and sharing pain. It doesn’t fix findability, duplicate documents, or the question of which version of the safety manual is current, because it doesn’t try to. Neither product fixes that. Structure fixes that, and structure has to be designed on whichever platform you choose. Our post on why a SharePoint migration isn’t a file move explains what that design work looks like.
When Egnyte Is the Better Choice
Egnyte wins when the daily work is large files, distributed sites, and constant sharing with outside parties, and the company doesn’t have anyone to design and run SharePoint. That describes a lot of construction, architecture and engineering firms, and it’s where we tell prospects to buy Egnyte.
Specifically, Egnyte is the stronger choice when:
- Field offices or job sites work on multi-gigabyte files over poor connections, and local caching through an edge device is the difference between usable and unusable
- Project teams share hundreds of folders with subcontractors and owners’ representatives who come and go, and nobody has time to run guest access reviews
- The company runs Google Workspace rather than Microsoft 365, so SharePoint isn’t already paid for
- There is no SharePoint administrator and no plan to hire or contract one
- Users have to work with CAD, BIM and media files in desktop applications that expect a mapped drive
The last two are the real deciders. Egnyte’s sync client and folder model ask very little of users or IT. SharePoint asks more of both, and pays back more, but only if someone owns it.
When SharePoint Is the Better Choice
SharePoint wins when the company already runs Microsoft 365, works in Teams, needs metadata or retention or approval workflows, plans to use Copilot, or simply doesn’t want to pay a second platform for storage it already owns. For organizations above about 100 employees with an IT team, that’s the common case.
SharePoint is the stronger choice when:
- Documents need to be found by what they are, not where they sit, which means metadata and search rather than folder paths
- Policies, procedures or controlled documents need versioning, approval and an audit trail, which is the territory of SharePoint document control
- Retention, legal hold and sensitivity labeling need to apply to files and to Teams chats and email under one policy through Purview
- Copilot is on the roadmap, since Copilot grounds on SharePoint and OneDrive content and gets nothing from Egnyte without connectors
- The company works in Teams all day and doesn’t want files living in a different system from the conversations about them
The trade is that SharePoint needs to be designed, and the design has to be owned after launch. That’s the argument we make on our SharePoint document management page, and it’s the part most companies underinvest in.
Egnyte vs SharePoint on Cost
On license cost alone SharePoint almost always wins, because it comes with Microsoft 365. The comparison gets honest when you add what each one costs to run well.
Egnyte costs list price per user per year, plus storage over the included amount, plus edge hardware if you need caching, and very little consulting. Most companies can stand it up with a reseller.
SharePoint costs nothing extra in licenses for most companies, but doing it well costs design and migration work up front, and some ongoing ownership. For a 200-person company, a well-run SharePoint document management project is often in the same range as a single year of Egnyte at an Enterprise tier, and it doesn’t renew. Our Migration ROI Calculator will run your own numbers, and how much a SharePoint migration costs explains what drives the consulting side.
The unfair version of this comparison is Egnyte’s list price against SharePoint at zero. The fair version is Egnyte’s list price against the cost of a SharePoint design that people will use. Run the fair version.
Running Both: The Common Middle State
Plenty of companies end up with both, usually by accident. Microsoft 365 for email and Teams, Egnyte for files, and a slow drift of documents into Teams channels that nobody intended. Within a year there are two file systems and no rule for which one a document belongs in.
If you run both on purpose, write the rule down: Egnyte for project files with outside partners and large media, SharePoint for everything that lives in Teams and everything that needs metadata or retention. Then enforce it. The accidental version of this state is worse than either product alone, and it’s the environment we’re most often asked to untangle.
How to Decide Between Egnyte and SharePoint
Answer four questions before you look at a single feature list:
- Do we already pay for Microsoft 365, and do our people work in Teams?
- Is our daily pain sync, sharing and large files, or is it finding the right document and proving it’s the current one?
- Will anyone own the platform after launch, and do they have hours for it?
- Is Copilot or any Microsoft AI in our two-year plan?
Yes to 1 and 4, or a “finding” answer to 2, points at SharePoint. A “sync” answer to 2 with a no on 3 points at Egnyte. If you’re switching from Egnyte to SharePoint, treat it as a restructure and not a copy, and start with our SharePoint migration services page. If you’re stuck between the two, a document management assessment will answer question 2 with your own content in front of you, which usually settles the whole thing. Or tell us what you’re weighing and we’ll give you a straight answer, including “buy Egnyte” when that’s the right one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Egnyte a document management system?
Egnyte is a file sync and share platform with governance features, and it’s an excellent one. It does not offer the metadata-driven organization, content types, or document-centric workflows that define a document management system. Companies that buy it expecting document management get a very good file server in the cloud, which may be exactly what they need.
Can Egnyte and SharePoint work together?
Yes. Egnyte offers Microsoft 365 co-editing and a Teams integration, so users can open Office files stored in Egnyte and edit them in Office. What you don’t get is Copilot grounding, Purview retention, or SharePoint metadata on Egnyte content. If both systems run side by side, write a clear rule for which content lives where.
Is SharePoint cheaper than Egnyte?
In license cost, almost always, because SharePoint is included in Microsoft 365. In total cost, SharePoint needs design and migration work up front to be worth using, and that’s the number to compare against Egnyte’s annual fee. For companies of 100 or more employees, the one-time SharePoint investment usually comes out ahead within two to three years.
Why do construction firms choose Egnyte over SharePoint?
Large drawing files, job sites with poor connectivity, and constant folder sharing with subcontractors. Egnyte’s edge caching and folder-based external sharing handle those well with little administration. Construction firms with a SharePoint administrator and a Teams-centered workflow do well on SharePoint too, but the ones without either are usually better served by Egnyte.
Should I move from Egnyte to SharePoint?
Only if your reasons are about findability, retention, Teams, or Copilot, and only if someone will own SharePoint after the move. If your reasons are cost alone, price the SharePoint design work honestly first. Moving a folder tree from Egnyte into SharePoint unchanged recreates the file share you’re paying Egnyte for, without Egnyte’s sync client.
Reviewed By
